Governance Tokenomics
The Governance Tokenomics Process in the Agentic Kindred Protocol establishes the framework for decentralized decision-making, incentivizing participation, and maintaining a sustainable ecosystem. Governance is conducted through a dual-DAO framework: the Kindred DAO oversees protocol-wide governance, while AS-DAOs manage agent-specific governance. Governance tokens and agent-specific tokens work together to empower the community, fund ecosystem development, and drive sustainability.
Core Objectives
Decentralized Decision-Making:
Kindred DAO governs protocol-wide decisions, such as tokenomics, treasury management, and ecosystem-wide policies.
AS-DAOs govern agent-specific decisions, such as bonding curve parameters, feature updates, and treasury allocations.
Incentivization:
Reward contributors, stakers, and active participants to encourage engagement and ensure ecosystem growth.
Economic Sustainability:
Maintain long-term viability through strategic fund allocations and revenue generation at both global and agent levels.
Transparency and Fairness:
Ensure governance is inclusive, transparent, and resistant to centralization.
Governance Framework
Kindred DAO Responsibilities
Approve protocol-wide proposals, such as:
New agent genesis and AS-DAO creation.
Treasury allocations for ecosystem development.
Governance token staking rewards.
Oversee the integration of new technologies, upgrades, and security measures.
Manage the Kindred DAO treasury.
AS-DAO Responsibilities
Manage agent-specific governance, including:
Bonding curve adjustments.
Treasury allocations for agent-specific maintenance and feature updates.
Revenue distribution from agent-specific services.
Approve and execute proposals directly affecting the agent’s economy and functionality.
Technical Workflow
1. Token Creation and Distribution
Governance Tokens (Global):
ERC-20 tokens representing voting power in the Kindred DAO.
Tokenomics:
Fixed total supply with an initial allocation to founders, community pools, and staking rewards.
Distributed through:
Staking rewards for governance token holders.
Contributor incentives for ecosystem-wide improvements.
Agent Tokens (Agent-Specific):
Each AS-DAO governs its unique agent token, created during the agent genesis process.
Tokenomics:
Bonding curve parameters, reserve ratios, and token utility are determined and managed by the AS-DAO.
2. Governance Mechanisms
Proposal Submission:
Token holders submit proposals to the respective DAO for protocol or agent-specific governance.
Proposals include:
Kindred DAO: Protocol-wide decisions such as treasury allocations and tokenomics updates.
AS-DAOs: Agent-specific decisions such as updates, feature integrations, or bonding curve adjustments.
Submission Workflow:
Voting:
Token holders vote on proposals during a defined voting period.
Kindred DAO Voting:
Weighted by governance tokens held or staked.
Requires quorum participation from global token holders.
AS-DAO Voting:
Weighted by agent-specific tokens held or staked.
Requires quorum participation from AS-DAO token holders.
3. Incentivization Mechanisms
Staking:
Both governance tokens and agent-specific tokens can be staked for rewards and enhanced voting power.
Rewards are funded by the respective treasury:
Kindred DAO Treasury: Staking rewards in governance tokens.
AS-DAO Treasury: Staking rewards in agent tokens.
Contributor Rewards:
Governance tokens and agent tokens are distributed as rewards for contributors providing datasets, models, or community support.
Rewards are approved by the respective DAO.
4. Treasury Management
Kindred DAO Treasury:
Funded by:
KIN tokens collected during agent genesis.
A portion of transaction fees from protocol-wide activities.
Allocates funds for:
Staking rewards.
Ecosystem-wide development grants.
Community incentives.
AS-DAO Treasury:
Funded by:
Token sales during IAOs.
Transaction fees from agent-specific services.
Allocates funds for:
Feature updates.
Liquidity provisioning.
Contributor rewards.
5. Governance Token and Agent Token Use Cases
Governance Tokens (Global):
Voting: Participate in Kindred DAO proposals.
Staking: Lock tokens to earn rewards and boost voting power.
DeFi Utility: Usable as collateral in DeFi platforms.
Agent Tokens (Agent-Specific):
Governance: Vote on AS-DAO proposals.
Staking: Earn rewards and influence AS-DAO decisions.
Utility:
Access agent-specific services and premium features.
Purchase NFTs or customizations for the agent.
Example Use Case: Dual-DAO Governance in Action
Scenario:
A contributor proposes a new feature for an agent that requires 10,000 agent tokens for development.
Workflow:
Proposal Submission:
The proposal is submitted to the agent’s AS-DAO with a funding request.
Voting:
Token holders in the AS-DAO vote on the proposal.
Approval:
If approved, the AS-DAO treasury disburses the requested funds to the contributor.
Execution:
The contributor develops and integrates the feature, enhancing the agent’s functionality.
Security Measures
Smart Contract Audits:
Governance and staking contracts undergo rigorous audits to ensure security.
Access Control:
Only DAO-approved administrators can disburse funds from treasuries.
Quorum and Majority Rules:
Proposals require minimum participation and consensus to pass.
Reentrancy Protection:
Prevents exploits during voting, staking, and fund disbursements.
Benefits of Dual-DAO Governance Tokenomics
Decentralized Governance:
Splits responsibilities between Kindred DAO (global) and AS-DAOs (agent-specific) for greater scalability.
Sustainability:
Treasury funds at both levels ensure long-term ecosystem support.
Community Engagement:
Token holders actively participate in decision-making through global and agent-specific governance.
Scalability:
The dual-DAO framework supports an expanding ecosystem with multiple agents, each governed by its AS-DAO.
Conclusion
The Governance Tokenomics Process in the Agentic Kindred Protocol integrates Kindred DAO and AS-DAOs to create a scalable, transparent, and decentralized governance system. This dual-DAO framework empowers token holders to participate actively in protocol-wide and agent-specific decisions, ensuring economic sustainability, incentivizing contributions, and aligning governance with the protocol’s growth and evolution. Through this structure, the protocol establishes a robust and engaging ecosystem for adaptive and intelligent agents.
Last updated