Kindred
  • Overview
    • Introduction
      • Breathe Life Into AI
        • The Human Need for Connection
          • The Story Behind Kindred
          • The Role of Empathy in AI
          • Building Emotionally Intelligent AI
          • The Future of Human-AI Interaction
        • Personalized AI: From Assistance to Companionship
          • The Growing Need for Personalized AI
          • Kindred’s Approach: Emotional AI Agents
          • Impact Across Diverse User Groups
          • Privacy, Security, and Ethical Design
    • Pioneering New Possibilities Across Industries
  • The Problem
  • The Solution
    • What are Kindreds?
      • Mind
      • Body
      • Soul
      • Unified Interface
    • Licensed IP Partnerships
  • Product Roadmap
    • Phase 0: Pilot Campaigns
    • Phase 1: Genesis Open Beta
    • Phase 2: The Protocol
      • Agent Creation and Tokenization
      • Revenue Flow and Value Transfer
      • Governance and Incentives
      • Sustainable Ecosystem Design
    • Phase 3: Advanced AI Ecosystem
      • Comprehensive Task Execution
      • Autonomous Farming
      • Cross-Device Integration
      • Agent-to-Agent Interactions
      • All-In-One AI Ecosystem
    • Phase 4: Agentic XR
      • Key Capabilities of Agentic XR
      • Strategic Involvement and Future Potential
      • A Future Without Boundaries
  • Agentic Kindred Protocol on Blockchain
    • Overview
      • What is Agentic Kindred Protocol
      • How the Protocol Works
    • Core Infrastructure
      • Agent Genesis Contract
      • Immutable Contribution Vault (ICV)
      • Stateful AI Runner (SAR)
      • Long-Term Memory Processor (LTMP)
    • Liquidity and Tokenomics
      • Bootstrapping Liquidity and $Agent Token Usage
      • Initial Agent Offering (IAO) Process
      • Governance Tokenomics
    • AI and Interaction Layers
      • Emotion Engine
      • Cross-Platform Integration Layer (CPIL)
      • Coordinator
    • Governance and Contribution
      • Kindred DAO
      • Agent-Specific DAOs (AS-DAOs)
      • Contributor Lifecycle
    • API - (Coming Soon)
  • $KIN Tokenomics
    • Community-Driven IP Pooling and Co-Ownership
    • Protocol Treasury Allocation
    • Enhanced Offerings Within the Ecosystem
    • $KIN Emission Rewards and Governance
    • The $KIN Flywheel Effect
    • Tokenomics Structure
  • Leadership & Team
  • Important Links
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. Agentic Kindred Protocol on Blockchain
  2. Liquidity and Tokenomics

Governance Tokenomics

The Governance Tokenomics Process in the Agentic Kindred Protocol establishes the framework for decentralized decision-making, incentivizing participation, and maintaining a sustainable ecosystem. Governance is conducted through a dual-DAO framework: the Kindred DAO oversees protocol-wide governance, while AS-DAOs manage agent-specific governance. Governance tokens and agent-specific tokens work together to empower the community, fund ecosystem development, and drive sustainability.


Core Objectives

  1. Decentralized Decision-Making:

    • Kindred DAO governs protocol-wide decisions, such as tokenomics, treasury management, and ecosystem-wide policies.

    • AS-DAOs govern agent-specific decisions, such as bonding curve parameters, feature updates, and treasury allocations.

  2. Incentivization:

    • Reward contributors, stakers, and active participants to encourage engagement and ensure ecosystem growth.

  3. Economic Sustainability:

    • Maintain long-term viability through strategic fund allocations and revenue generation at both global and agent levels.

  4. Transparency and Fairness:

    • Ensure governance is inclusive, transparent, and resistant to centralization.


Governance Framework

Kindred DAO Responsibilities

  • Approve protocol-wide proposals, such as:

    • New agent genesis and AS-DAO creation.

    • Treasury allocations for ecosystem development.

    • Governance token staking rewards.

  • Oversee the integration of new technologies, upgrades, and security measures.

  • Manage the Kindred DAO treasury.

AS-DAO Responsibilities

  • Manage agent-specific governance, including:

    • Bonding curve adjustments.

    • Treasury allocations for agent-specific maintenance and feature updates.

    • Revenue distribution from agent-specific services.

  • Approve and execute proposals directly affecting the agent’s economy and functionality.


Technical Workflow

1. Token Creation and Distribution

Governance Tokens (Global):

  • ERC-20 tokens representing voting power in the Kindred DAO.

  • Tokenomics:

    • Fixed total supply with an initial allocation to founders, community pools, and staking rewards.

    • Distributed through:

      • Staking rewards for governance token holders.

      • Contributor incentives for ecosystem-wide improvements.

Agent Tokens (Agent-Specific):

  • Each AS-DAO governs its unique agent token, created during the agent genesis process.

  • Tokenomics:

    • Bonding curve parameters, reserve ratios, and token utility are determined and managed by the AS-DAO.


2. Governance Mechanisms

Proposal Submission:

  • Token holders submit proposals to the respective DAO for protocol or agent-specific governance.

  • Proposals include:

    • Kindred DAO: Protocol-wide decisions such as treasury allocations and tokenomics updates.

    • AS-DAOs: Agent-specific decisions such as updates, feature integrations, or bonding curve adjustments.

Submission Workflow:

solidityCopy codefunction submitProposal(
    string memory title,
    string memory details,
    uint256 fundingRequest,
    bool isGlobal
) public returns (uint256) {
    uint256 proposalId = _generateProposalId();
    proposals[proposalId] = Proposal({
        proposer: msg.sender,
        title: title,
        details: details,
        fundingRequest: fundingRequest,
        isGlobal: isGlobal,
        votesFor: 0,
        votesAgainst: 0,
        status: ProposalStatus.Pending
    });
    emit ProposalSubmitted(proposalId, msg.sender, title);
    return proposalId;
}

Voting:

  • Token holders vote on proposals during a defined voting period.

  • Kindred DAO Voting:

    • Weighted by governance tokens held or staked.

    • Requires quorum participation from global token holders.

  • AS-DAO Voting:

    • Weighted by agent-specific tokens held or staked.

    • Requires quorum participation from AS-DAO token holders.


3. Incentivization Mechanisms

Staking:

  • Both governance tokens and agent-specific tokens can be staked for rewards and enhanced voting power.

  • Rewards are funded by the respective treasury:

    • Kindred DAO Treasury: Staking rewards in governance tokens.

    • AS-DAO Treasury: Staking rewards in agent tokens.

Contributor Rewards:

  • Governance tokens and agent tokens are distributed as rewards for contributors providing datasets, models, or community support.

  • Rewards are approved by the respective DAO.


4. Treasury Management

Kindred DAO Treasury:

  • Funded by:

    • KIN tokens collected during agent genesis.

    • A portion of transaction fees from protocol-wide activities.

  • Allocates funds for:

    • Staking rewards.

    • Ecosystem-wide development grants.

    • Community incentives.

AS-DAO Treasury:

  • Funded by:

    • Token sales during IAOs.

    • Transaction fees from agent-specific services.

  • Allocates funds for:

    • Feature updates.

    • Liquidity provisioning.

    • Contributor rewards.


5. Governance Token and Agent Token Use Cases

Governance Tokens (Global):

  • Voting: Participate in Kindred DAO proposals.

  • Staking: Lock tokens to earn rewards and boost voting power.

  • DeFi Utility: Usable as collateral in DeFi platforms.

Agent Tokens (Agent-Specific):

  • Governance: Vote on AS-DAO proposals.

  • Staking: Earn rewards and influence AS-DAO decisions.

  • Utility:

    • Access agent-specific services and premium features.

    • Purchase NFTs or customizations for the agent.


Example Use Case: Dual-DAO Governance in Action

Scenario:

  • A contributor proposes a new feature for an agent that requires 10,000 agent tokens for development.

Workflow:

  1. Proposal Submission:

    • The proposal is submitted to the agent’s AS-DAO with a funding request.

  2. Voting:

    • Token holders in the AS-DAO vote on the proposal.

  3. Approval:

    • If approved, the AS-DAO treasury disburses the requested funds to the contributor.

  4. Execution:

    • The contributor develops and integrates the feature, enhancing the agent’s functionality.


Security Measures

  1. Smart Contract Audits:

    • Governance and staking contracts undergo rigorous audits to ensure security.

  2. Access Control:

    • Only DAO-approved administrators can disburse funds from treasuries.

  3. Quorum and Majority Rules:

    • Proposals require minimum participation and consensus to pass.

  4. Reentrancy Protection:

    • Prevents exploits during voting, staking, and fund disbursements.


Benefits of Dual-DAO Governance Tokenomics

  1. Decentralized Governance:

    • Splits responsibilities between Kindred DAO (global) and AS-DAOs (agent-specific) for greater scalability.

  2. Sustainability:

    • Treasury funds at both levels ensure long-term ecosystem support.

  3. Community Engagement:

    • Token holders actively participate in decision-making through global and agent-specific governance.

  4. Scalability:

    • The dual-DAO framework supports an expanding ecosystem with multiple agents, each governed by its AS-DAO.


Conclusion

The Governance Tokenomics Process in the Agentic Kindred Protocol integrates Kindred DAO and AS-DAOs to create a scalable, transparent, and decentralized governance system. This dual-DAO framework empowers token holders to participate actively in protocol-wide and agent-specific decisions, ensuring economic sustainability, incentivizing contributions, and aligning governance with the protocol’s growth and evolution. Through this structure, the protocol establishes a robust and engaging ecosystem for adaptive and intelligent agents.

PreviousInitial Agent Offering (IAO) ProcessNextAI and Interaction Layers

Last updated 2 months ago